Is there any case law or precedent for the prosecution of Count 6.6.8(1) of the Criminal Code Code where the prosecution relied on information provided by the Attorney General to support the Plaintiff's position on Count 6?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Bowens, C071825 (Cal. App. 2018):

information and the prosecutor's reliance on slightly earlier conduct to support Count 6. Any argument that such variance is material is therefore forfeited. (See Colbert v. Colbert (1946) 28 Cal.2d 276, 281.)

Other Questions


Is there any instructional error in general criminal intent instruction used by the trial court to include counts 4 and 7 in the General Criminal intent instruction? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General have the authority to rely solely on a confidential informant's personal information? (California, United States of America)
Does section 654 of the California Criminal Code bar prosecution for the robbery charged in count 2 of the information in the Information Protection Act? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the District Attorney's Office be able to provide information to the criminal division of the Criminal Division of the Department of Justice? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for corroboration of information provided by an informant in a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
Can a letter between the Attorney General and Attorney General be admitted as a public record? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General have an obligation to provide a good faith effort to obtain materials from a defendant's trial attorney? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be convicted of both counts of membership of a criminal street gang and a charge of criminal activity under section 654 of the California Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General's sentencing error under section 667.5, subdivision (a) of the California Criminal Code apply to recidivism enhancements under sections 667 and 667 of the Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
What is the Attorney General's position on a referee's finding that a defense counsel's decision not to investigate the backgrounds of informants was constitutionally deficient? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.