Is there an exception in the law where evidence of jealousy, quarrels, antagonism or enmity between two individuals is sufficient to convict one person of a crime?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Petrovich, F065617 (Cal. App. 2014):

The exception is based on the importance of motive and its close relationship to identity in situations where there is a history of discord between two individuals. "'In a case where the identity of a person who commits a crime is attempted to be proven by circumstantial evidence, such as in the case at bar, evidence of a motive on the part of a defendant charged is always a subject of proof, and the fact of motive particularly material.'" (People v. Daniels (1971) 16 Cal.App.3d 36, 46, original italics, citations omitted.) "Evidence showing jealousy, quarrels, antagonism or enmity between an

Page 9

Other Questions


In what circumstances will the Court consider the sufficiency of evidence in determining whether the evidence was sufficient to prevent or dissuade a victim or witness from reporting a crime? (California, United States of America)
Is a person who aids or abets a crime liable for the crime if the original crime was committed independently by another person? (California, United States of America)
What is the law on unanimity in a criminal case where the evidence of a crime is only a single crime but the evidence supports the theory of the crime? (California, United States of America)
What is the legal test for sufficiency of evidence to support a conviction where the evidence is based primarily on circumstantial evidence? (California, United States of America)
When reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the conviction of a convicted rapist, does the court have to review the evidence in the context of section 1118.1? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant who is convicted of receiving stolen property in one crime, but never charged or convicted of the other crime, be required to pay restitution for losses sustained in other crimes? (California, United States of America)
Can a police officer investigating an individual who is not currently charged with certain crimes obtain evidence of new or anticipated crimes from that individual? (California, United States of America)
In assessing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction, what is the test for a jury to convict a defendant of sexual assault? (California, United States of America)
What is sufficient corroborating evidence to sustain the conviction of a convicted burglar for running and hiding from the police? (California, United States of America)
Can a jury use uncharged crime evidence to determine that defendant was more likely to have committed the charged crimes because he committed the uncharged crimes? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.