The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Matta-Ballesteros, 72 F.3d 136 (9th Cir. 1995):
Matta alleges an anti-defendant bias in some of the court's evidentiary rulings. In particular, he objects to the court's exclusion of photographs depicting Matta delivering Christmas presents to his employees, and to the court's refusal to exclude tapes made of Matta's two-way radio conversations and airplane manuals found at Matta's home. The district court's determinations of relevancy are reviewed for an abuse of discretion. United States v. Schaff, 948 F.2d 501, 505-06 (9th Cir.1991).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.