Is the testimony of a single witness sufficient to sustain a conviction?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Canizalez, B218515 (Cal. App. 2011):

conviction. (People v. Scott (1988) 21 Cal.3d 284, 296 ["The uncorroborated testimony of a single witness is sufficient to sustain a conviction, unless the testimony is physically impossible or inherently improbable"].)

Other Questions


Is a single witness' testimony sufficient to sustain a conviction for assault with intent to murder? (California, United States of America)
Does the testimony of a single witness have to be sufficient to sustain a conviction? (California, United States of America)
Is the testimony of a single witness sufficient to support a conviction? (California, United States of America)
Is the testimony of a single witness sufficient to support a conviction? (California, United States of America)
Is the testimony of a single witness sufficient to convict a defendant in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
Is the testimony of a single witness sufficient to support a conviction? (California, United States of America)
Is the testimony of a single witness sufficient to support a conviction? (California, United States of America)
Is the testimony of a single witness sufficient to support a conviction? (California, United States of America)
Is the testimony of a single witness sufficient to support a conviction? (California, United States of America)
Is the testimony of a single witness sufficient to convict a carjacking suspect? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.