Is the testimony of a single witness sufficient to convict a defendant in a sexual assault case?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Ortiz-Bravo, A155917 (Cal. App. 2020):

7. Generally, "unless the testimony is physically impossible or inherently improbable, testimony of a single witness is sufficient to support a conviction." (People v. Young (2005) 34 Cal.4th 1149, 1181.) Here, defendant does not contend it was physically impossible or inherently improbable that the victim began orally copulating defendant when she was seven years old, and there is nothing in the record that suggests such impossibility or improbability.

Other Questions


Is the court abused its discretion in refusing to protect a witness in a sexual assault case from the possibility that the prosecution witnesses in the case colluded to corroborate their testimony? (California, United States of America)
In a sexual assault case, can defendant appeal against his convictions for sexual assault against two different victims? (California, United States of America)
When reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction of a defendant in a sexual assault case, what is the test for sufficiency? (California, United States of America)
What is the factual and procedural background to a motion of appeal against the conviction of defendant in the case of defendant's sexual assault conviction? (California, United States of America)
In a sexual assault case, is a defendant more culpable in committing two acts of sodomy than if they committed only one act of sexual assault? (California, United States of America)
Is there any reason to exclude evidence of sexual assault prior to the trial of defendant in his sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
When testifying in a sexual assault case, does the use of the word "sex" by the victims constitute sufficient evidence for the purposes of sexual arousal or sexual gratification? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for failing to provide sufficient evidence to convict a defendant in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law where a defendant's prior conviction for sexual assault was not sufficient evidence of implied malice? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law or case law in which a defendant has been successful in appealing against his conviction for sexual assault? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.