Is the reference in each account in this matter sufficient to make it final? I think not. Hood J. in Morin, Grant v. Olsson (37 C.P.C. (3d) 130) found that titling each account sent as "interim account" did not necessarily define the account as interim nor did it preclude each account from being final. In coming to that conclusion he stated (para. 19): I have considered not only the contents of the accounts which on their face are conclusive for the services rendered during the stated period, but, as well, the dealings between the parties and the circumstances. I have also considered the dealings between the parties in this matter in concluding that the mutual intent was that the accounts represent payment on account of fees or disbursements in respect of an entire contract.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.