Is section 654 of the California Civil Code applicable where a defendant chooses a means that harms more than one person?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Mendez, A128082 (Cal. App. 2011):

places a planeload of passengers in danger, or results in injury to many persons, is properly subject to greater punishment than a defendant who chooses a means that harms only a single person. This distinction between an act of violence against the person that violates more than one statute and such an act that harms more than one person is well settled. Section 654 is not ". . . applicable where . . . one act has two results each of which is an act of violence against the person of a separate individual." [Citations.]' [Citation.]" (People v. Oates (2004) 32 Cal.4th 1048, 1063.)

"The question whether section 654 is factually applicable . . . is for the trial court, and the law gives the trial court broad latitude in making this determination. Its findings on this question must be upheld on appeal if there is any substantial evidence to support them. [Citations.]" (People v. Hutchins (2001) 90 Cal.App.4th 1308, 1312.)

Other Questions


Does Section 1054(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure, section 1054 et. seq. and section 854 of the Criminal Code, allow defense counsel to conduct their investigation and prepare for trial? (California, United States of America)
Does the active participation provision in section 654 of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure provide an exemption to the application for Section 654? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for Section 654 of the California Criminal Code when a defendant is found guilty of a breach of section 654 or section 744 of the Code of Civil Procedure? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be found to have committed a single physical act for purposes of section 654 of the California Criminal Code, Section 215 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 422 of the Criminal Code for carjacking? (California, United States of America)
Does section 12022.5, subdivision (a) of the California Penal Code, section 120 22.5(1) of Section 1385(2) apply to a defendant who personally uses a firearm in the commission of a felony or attempted felony? (California, United States of America)
Does Section 204 of the California Labor Code, section 204(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure, allow for personal injury damages to be sustained in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be convicted of violating section 148(a)(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure if the jury found a completed violation of section 148 prior to the officers' use of excessive force? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant in a civil action be found to have breached section 425.16, subdivision (e) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure Act? (California, United States of America)
What is the effect of section 352 of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure Guidelines on the exclusion of evidence in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant have a right against double jeopardy when he is convicted of two counts of violating section 148 of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.