California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Saysanasy, F081458 (Cal. App. 2021):
The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying Saysanasy's Romero motion based on his age. In addressing whether middle age is a factor in the context of dismissing a prior strike, the court in People v. Strong (2001) 87 Cal.App.4th 328, 345, stated, middle age, considered alone, does not remove a defendant from the spirit of the Three Strikes law because [o]therwise those criminals with the longest criminal records over the longest period of time would have a built-in argument that the very factor that takes them within the spirit of the Three Strikes law-a lengthy criminal career-has the inevitable consequence-middle age-that takes them outside the law's spirit. So too here, Saysanasy's age did not necessarily warrant a lesser punishment or take him out of the spirit of the three strikes law.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.