What factors will be considered by the Court on a motion to strike or vacate a prior serious and/or violent felony conviction?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Horton, B246874 (Cal. App. 2014):

The factors to be considered in ruling on a Romero motion were set forth in People v. Williams (1998) 17 Cal.4th 148, 161: "[I]n ruling whether to strike or vacate a prior serious and/or violent felony conviction allegation or finding under the Three Strikes law . . . 'in furtherance of justice' pursuant to Penal Code section 1385(a), or in reviewing such a ruling, the court in question must consider whether, in light of the nature and circumstances of his present felonies and prior serious and/or violent felony convictions, and the particulars of his background, character, and prospects, the defendant may be deemed outside the scheme's spirit, in whole or in part, and hence should be treated as though he had not previously been convicted of one or more serious and/or violent felonies."

Page 14

"[A] trial court's refusal or failure to dismiss or strike a prior conviction allegation under section 1385 is subject to review for abuse of discretion." (People v. Carmony (2004) 33 Cal.4th 367, 375.) "In reviewing for abuse of discretion, we are guided by two fundamental precepts. First, ' "[t]he burden is on the party attacking the sentence to clearly show that the sentencing decision was irrational or arbitrary. [Citation.] In the absence of such a showing, the trial court is presumed to have acted to achieve legitimate sentencing objectives, and its discretionary determination to impose a particular sentence will not be set aside on review." ' [Citations.] Second, a ' "decision will not be reversed merely because reasonable people might disagree. 'An appellate tribunal is neither authorized nor warranted in substituting its judgment for the judgment of the trial judge.' " ' [Citation.] Taken together, these precepts establish that a trial court does not abuse its discretion unless its decision is so irrational or arbitrary that no reasonable person could agree with it." (Id. at pp. 376-377.) Hence, " '[w]here the record demonstrates that the trial court balanced the relevant facts and reached an impartial decision in conformity with the spirit of the law, we shall affirm the trial court's ruling, even if we might have ruled differently in the first instance' " (Id. at p. 378.)

b. Discussion.

Other Questions


What factors will be considered by the Court on a motion to strike or vacate a prior serious and/or violent felony conviction? (California, United States of America)
What factors will the Court consider in its ruling on a motion to strike or vacate a prior serious and/or violent felony conviction? (California, United States of America)
When will a court strike or vacate a prior serious and/or violent felony conviction under the Three Strikes law? (California, United States of America)
In a motion to strike a serious prior felony conviction in the interest of justice, how have the courts treated prior criminal convictions in the context of the application? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a motion to strike or vacate a prior serious and/or violent felony conviction under the Three Strikes Act? (California, United States of America)
What is the basis for a motion to reverse the denial of defendant's motion to strike a prior serious or violent felony conviction under section 1385? (California, United States of America)
Can a judge strike or vacate an allegation or finding under the Three Strikes law that a defendant has previously been convicted of a serious and/or violent felony? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant punished under section 667, subdivision (a) of the California Criminal Code because he was convicted of having committed a new serious felony after suffering a prior serious felony conviction? (California, United States of America)
In a motion to dismiss one or both of appellant's prior strike convictions, can appellant appeal against the finding that the trial court abused its discretion in denying the motion? (California, United States of America)
Does a prior juvenile conviction constitute a prior felony conviction for "Three Strikes" purposes? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.