Is malice aforethought required for a Page 19 conviction for attempted murder?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Villareal, B291257 (Cal. App. 2020):

Villareal contends that this conclusion is contrary to the language of the newly amended section 188, which provides that except in cases of felony murder, "in order to be convicted of murder, a principal in a crime shall act with malice aforethought. Malice shall not be imputed to a person based solely on his or her participation in a crime." ( 188, subd. (a)(3).) In cases of direct liability, attempted murder requires an even stricter mental state than murder. Whereas a defendant may be guilty of murder simply by acting with conscious disregard for human life (People v. Bland (2002) 28 Cal.4th 313, 327), attempted murder requires the specific intent to kill. (People v. Smith (2005) 37 Cal.4th 733, 739.) If malice aforethought is now required for any murder

Page 19

conviction, Villareal argues that the same should be true for attempted murder.5

Other Questions


Does a juvenile court convicted minor of attempted second degree murder, not just attempted murder, but also of premeditated attempted murder? (California, United States of America)
Is implied malice required for a jury to convict a defendant of attempted murder? (California, United States of America)
What is the applicable section of section 186.22(b)(1)(C) of the California Criminal Code for the attempted murder of a man who was convicted of the crime of attempted murder? (California, United States of America)
Does the doctrine of implied malice or the felony-murder rule apply to a conviction of attempted murder? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant charged with the murder or attempted murder of an intended target also be convicted of the murder of another person? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant charged with the murder or attempted murder of an intended target also be convicted of the murder of other, nontargeted persons? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the Court reverse the conviction of defendant in the second-degree murder trial of a man convicted of the crime of murder for making false statements about the crime scene? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be convicted of first degree murder even if the indictment or information charged only murder with malice? (California, United States of America)
Does section 190.2(a)(2) of the California Criminal Code require a separate multiple-murder special circumstance to be attached to each murder conviction sustained in the capital case? (California, United States of America)
What is the prosecution's argument that defendant was not guilty of express-malice murder but at most of murder with implied malice? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.