Is it sufficient for a witness to be considered a witness in a criminal case to be able to provide assistance to the perpetrator?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Hernandez, H035408 (Cal. App. 2011):

and shares the perpetrator's criminal purpose. [Citation.] It is not sufficient that he merely gives assistance with knowledge of the perpetrator's criminal purpose." (People v. Sully (1991) 53 Cal.3d 1195, 1227.)

Other Questions


In what circumstances will the Court consider the sufficiency of evidence in determining whether the evidence was sufficient to prevent or dissuade a victim or witness from reporting a crime? (California, United States of America)
Is a witness who gives evidence at a joint trial considered a witness against a defendant if the jury is instructed to consider that testimony only against a codefendant? (California, United States of America)
Is a witness who gives evidence at a joint trial considered a witness against a defendant if the jury is instructed to consider that testimony only against a codefendant? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant have to provide a record of criminal convictions and a history of criminal activity with respect to criminal convictions? (California, United States of America)
Can an in-custody witness be considered a witness in a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a witness has a criminal conviction for a previous criminal conviction that was impeaching the same criminal offence? (California, United States of America)
Is a witness who gives evidence at a joint trial considered a witness against a defendant if the jury is instructed to consider that testimony only against a codefendant? (California, United States of America)
If a witness has been convicted of a criminal offence under section 28(f) of the California Criminal Code, is that prior conviction relevant for impeachment of a witness? (California, United States of America)
How should a jury consider other criminal activity at the penalty phase of a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
Is the failure to give a "reasonable doubt" instruction sufficient to be considered as an aggravating factor under section 190.3, subdivision (b) of the California Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.