I disagree. Litigants have a right to be present. There is some authority that it might be a good thing to give a warning, and it might make the process smoother: Kursheed v. Khoja, 2013 ONSC 69950. I think that imposing a duty to inform would be to take the process too far. I also think that it is unrealistic to expect that a litigant in a case involving alleged employee fraud with numerous documents not be in the room to advise and instruct the lawyer examining an opposing party.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.