Is it a crime for someone to "intentionally" record a confidential communication?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Estate of Kramme, 143 Cal.Rptr. 542, 20 Cal.3d 567, 573 P.2d 1369 (Cal. 1978):

5 In People v. Superior Court (Smith), supra, 70 Cal.2d at p. 134, 74 Cal.Rptr. 294, 449 P.2d 230, this court interpreted analogous statutory language in former Penal Code section 653j, subdivision (a), which made it a crime for anyone to "intentionally . . . (record) a confidential communication." This court held that "intentionally" in that statute required an intent to bring about the proscribed result rather than an intent merely to do an act which unintentionally brought about that result. Thus, the court concluded that the Penal Code section required an intent to record a confidential communication, rather than simply an intent to turn on a recording apparatus which happened to record a confidential communication.

6 Civil Code section 2224 provides:

Other Questions


When a defendant admits committing a crime but denies the necessary intent for the charged crime because of mistake or accident, is intent to commit the crime admissible? (California, United States of America)
Is it a crime to intentionally record a confidential communication? (California, United States of America)
Is it a crime to intentionally record a confidential communication? (California, United States of America)
Is it a crime to intentionally record a confidential communication? (California, United States of America)
Is it a crime to intentionally record a confidential communication? (California, United States of America)
Is the intent of an aider and abettor to facilitate the commission of a specific intent crime necessarily the intent to achieve a future consequence? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant admits committing a crime but denies the necessary intent for the charged crime, does other-crimes evidence admissible? (California, United States of America)
Does changing the confidential character of a communication between two parties change the confidential nature of the communication? (California, United States of America)
What is the effect of referring to count 3 as a specific intent crime rather than a general intent crime? (California, United States of America)
Does reading confidential psychiatric records of a crime victim constitute a communication under litigation privilege? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.