Is an out-of-court statement not hearsay?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Salinas, G053350 (Cal. App. 2018):

Under the hearsay rule, an out-of-court statement is generally inadmissible when the statement "is offered to prove the truth of the matter stated." (Evid. Code, 1200, subds. (a) & (b).) However, the hearsay rule has a number of exceptions, including a statement of a declarant's mental or physical state. (Evid. Code, 1250, subd. (a).) Therefore, a statement is not hearsay, "when: (1) The evidence is offered to prove the declarant's state of mind, emotion, or physical sensation at that time . . . ; or (2) The evidence is offered to prove or explain acts or conduct of the declarant." (Evid. Code, 1250, subd. (a).) An out-of-court statement is also not hearsay when it is being offered for not for its truth, but rather for a nonhearsay purpose (such as the effect on the person who heard the statement). (See People v. Montes (2014) 58 Cal.4th 809, 863.)

Other Questions


When a defendant has adopted a statement as his own as an adoptive admission, is that statement admissible under the hearsay rule? (California, United States of America)
Does a hearsay statement that identifies a defendant by name as the driver of a car involved in a shooting constitute hearsay evidence? (California, United States of America)
Is a statement that is not "hearsay" considered hearsay in a civil case? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant's statement of intent to commit a crime a hearsay exception to the hearsay rule? (California, United States of America)
Does Counsel's statements imply that Counsel never stated whether a witness's statement was made in connection with the matter on which counsel represented her? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant appeal against a finding that a statement made by a witness was hearsay? (California, United States of America)
When is an out-of-court statement not hearsay? (California, United States of America)
Can expert testimony be used to assist the jury in determining whether a statement or series of statements implied defamatory facts? (California, United States of America)
Does an expert who is an expert in medical malpractice have to produce a declaration of opinion based on hearsay statements? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant's extrajudicial statements form part of the prosecution's evidence, does the trial court have to instruct sua sponte that a finding of guilt cannot be predicated on the statements alone? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.