Is a plaintiff's failure to object to identification procedure as "unduly suggestive and unreliable"?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Jimenez, H043629 (Cal. App. 2019):
court"]; People v. Medina (1995) 11 Cal.4th 694, 753 [defendant's failure to object to identification procedure as "unduly suggestive and unreliable" forfeited the claim].)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have courts treated claims that identification procedures were unduly suggestive? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for overturning a conviction on the grounds that the identification procedure was unduly suggestive? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated claims that identification procedures were unduly suggestive? (California, United States of America)
What is the burden of proving that the identification procedure was unduly suggestive and unfair? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated claims that identification procedures were unduly suggestive? (California, United States of America)
What is the burden of proving that an identification procedure was unduly suggestive and unfair? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated claims that identification procedures were unduly suggestive? (California, United States of America)
What is the burden of proving that an identification procedure was unduly suggestive and unfair? (California, United States of America)
If a police identification procedure has been unduly suggestive and unnecessary, is it unlawful? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for establishing that an identification procedure employed here was unduly suggestive? (California, United States of America)
