What is the burden of proving that the identification procedure was unduly suggestive and unfair?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Williams, D066230 (Cal. App. 2015):

A defendant "'has the burden of showing that the identification procedure was unduly suggestive and unfair "as a demonstrable reality, not just speculation." [Citation.] . . . . [] . . . '[A]n identification procedure is considered suggestive if it "caused defendant to 'stand out' from the others in a way that would suggest the witness should select him." [Citation.]' [Citation.]" (People v. Johnson (2010) 183 Cal.App.4th 253, 271-272.)

B. Deficient Performance

Other Questions


What is the burden of proving that an identification procedure was unduly suggestive and unfair? (California, United States of America)
What is the burden of proving that an identification procedure was unduly suggestive and unfair? (California, United States of America)
What is the burden of proving that the identification procedure was suggestive, unreliable and so unfair? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for overturning a conviction on the grounds that the identification procedure was unduly suggestive? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated claims that identification procedures were unduly suggestive? (California, United States of America)
If a police identification procedure has been unduly suggestive and unnecessary, is it unlawful? (California, United States of America)
What is the burden of proving that there is an unreliable identification procedure? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated claims that identification procedures were unduly suggestive? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated claims that identification procedures were unduly suggestive? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated claims that identification procedures were unduly suggestive? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.