Is a mistake of fact a crime for failing to instruct a defendant on a defense that disproves any criminal intent?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Smith, C053202 (Cal. App. 7/25/2007), C053202 (Cal. App. 2007):

An act committed under a mistake of fact which disproves any criminal intent is not a crime. (See Pen. Code, 26, class Three.) However, the failure to instruct on a defense sua sponte or even at the defendant's request is not error if there was no substantial evidence supporting the defense. (See People v. Rivera (1984) 157 Cal.App.3d 736, 743.)

Other Questions


Is there any instructional error in general criminal intent instruction used by the trial court to include counts 4 and 7 in the General Criminal intent instruction? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant admits committing a crime but denies the necessary intent for the charged crime because of mistake or accident, is intent to commit the crime admissible? (California, United States of America)
If a defendant's claim that defense counsel negligent in failing to request an other-crimes limiting instruction under CALJIC No.50 fails, what are the consequences? (California, United States of America)
Is a person who committed a crime "under an ignorance or mistake of fact which disproves any criminal intent" incapable of committing the crime? (California, United States of America)
Can a self-represented defendant be found guilty of a criminal act against a criminal defendant under section 352 of the California Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
Is there an undue "chilling effect" on the procedural rights of criminal defendants when the jury instructs a criminal defendant to testify before the jury that he will be cross-examined? (California, United States of America)
Does Section 26 exempt a person from criminal liability under section 26 of the California Criminal Code from a general intent crime if they committed the crime while unconscious? (California, United States of America)
How to instruct a jury on general intent when a specific intent crime is charged against a defendant? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant have forfeited the issue of motive under section 1101, subdivision (b) of section 1103 of the Criminal Code for failing to provide evidence that the victim's prior criminal convictions would have bolstered his claim of self-defense? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be held criminally responsible as an accomplice not only for the crime he intended to do but also for any other crime that is a natural and probable consequence of the crime? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.