Is a lack of notice harmless beyond a reasonable doubt in a revocation of probation?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Orloff, 2d Crim. No. B275795 (Cal. App. 2017):
The lack of notice was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt because the court found that appellant had committed the charged probation violations, which warranted the revocation of probation. "Thus, affording [appellant] a new probation revocation hearing would be a futile act . . . ." (People v. Arreola (1994) 7 Cal.4th 1144, 1162.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does the doctrine of reasonable doubt apply to a defendant's due process right to appeal against a jury verdict that diminished the prosecution's burden to prove beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
Is a mistake in a written notice harmless beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard for determining whether defective notice is harmless beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the federal harmless error standard for determining that an error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for reasonable likelihood of a claim under the Chapman v. Chapman "harmless beyond a reasonable doubt" standard? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a reasonable probability of a more favourable result under the reasonable beyond reasonable doubt standard? (California, United States of America)
Does the absence of lingering doubt from a recitation of evidence the defense offered in an attempt to raise reasonable doubt raise a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will a jury interpret the instructions of a jury as permitting a conviction on a standard less than beyond beyond beyond the reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the difference between the "no reasonable possibility" standard and the "harmless beyond a reasonable doubt" standard? (California, United States of America)
Can an error be held harmless beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
