Is a jury required to instruct on "general principles of law that are commonly and openly connected to the facts before the jury"?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Garcia, H038479 (Cal. App. 2014):

"Even without a request, a trial court is obliged to instruct on ' "general principles of law that are commonly or closely and openly connected to the facts before the court and that are necessary for the jury's understanding of the case"' [citation] . . . . In particular, instructions delineating an aiding and abetting theory of liability must be given when such derivative culpability 'form[s] a part of the prosecution's theory of criminal liability and substantial evidence supports the theory.' [Citation.]" (People v. Delgado (2013) 56 Cal.4th 480, 488.)14 "[T]he State must prove every element of the offense, and a jury instruction violates due process if it fails to give effect to that requirement. [Citation.] Nonetheless, not every ambiguity, inconsistency, or deficiency in a jury instruction rises to the level of a due process violation." (Middleton v. McNeil (2004) 541 U.S. 433, 437.)

Other Questions


What is the test for instructing a jury on "the principles of law commonly or closely and openly connected with the facts of the case"? (California, United States of America)
Does a jury have a duty to instruct sua sponte on the principles of law that are closely and openly connected with the facts before the jury? (California, United States of America)
Does a jury have a duty to instruct sua sponte on the principles of law that are closely and openly connected with the facts before the jury? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General have any authority or authority to instruct a jury to disregard an instruction in an assault case where the instruction had no antecedent in the facts? (California, United States of America)
Is a judge required to instruct the jury on general principles which are necessary to the jury's understanding of the case? (California, United States of America)
Is there any instructional error in general criminal intent instruction used by the trial court to include counts 4 and 7 in the General Criminal intent instruction? (California, United States of America)
Is a jury required to be instructed on the general principles of law relevant to the issues raised by the trial court even in the absence of a request? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts instructed the jury to consider jury instructions in the context of the facts of a case? (California, United States of America)
What is the difference between the written and oral versions of jury instructions in a jury trial and the written version of the instructions given to the jury? (California, United States of America)
Does a jury's finding on a felony-murder special-circumstance allegation based on erroneous instruction that a jury would not have convicted appellant of second degree murder if the jury had been given the same instruction? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.