Is a federal judge required to conduct a thorough pretrial examination of a defendant's waiver of counsel?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Burnett, 188 Cal.App.3d 1314, 234 Cal.Rptr. 67 (Cal. App. 1987):

Such a rigorous pretrial inquiry is fully consistent with federal practice under the Sixth Amendment. Thus, for example, in Von Moltke v. Gillies (1948) 332 U.S. 708, 68 S.Ct. 316, 92 L.Ed. 309, Justice Black declared that a judge inquiring into the validity of a defendant's waiver of counsel "must investigate as long and as thoroughly as the circumstances of the case before him demand. ... A judge can make certain that an accused's professed waiver of counsel is understandingly and wisely made only from a penetrating and comprehensive examination of all the circumstances under

Page 71

Other Questions


Does Section 170.6, subdivision (2) of the Peremptory Challenge Act require counsel to disclose the identity of the assigned judge to counsel before counsel for the moving party learns that the assigning judge has been identified? (California, United States of America)
What is the effect of a federal judge's order requiring counsel to attend the post-conviction hearing of a defendant in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
Is a judge assigned to pass upon a disqualification notice required to counsel counsel of the assigned or agreed upon judge? (California, United States of America)
Does section 667.61 of the California Penal Code require a defendant to engage in a course of conduct in which he or she is a co-defendant? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for failing to provide a reasonable probability that defendant would have obtained a more favourable result if counsel had failed to provide counsel with reasonable counsel? (California, United States of America)
Does the failure to conduct a hearing to determine whether a defendant can pay for appointed counsel fees under Penal Code section 987.8 require a remand? (California, United States of America)
Can a prosecutor cross-examine a defendant's attorney's cross-examination of defendant on the basis that it was his own idea to lie and claim self-defense? (California, United States of America)
If counsel discovered that the burglary had been reduced to a misdemeanor, and lodged an objection below, would counsel have discovered that counsel had discovered that Counsel had discovered it was a misdemeanor? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a waiver of counsel when a defendant seeks to forgo the right to counsel and engage in self-representation? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant waiver his right to appear and defend in person and with counsel? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.