Is a failure to mention certain evidence fatal to the decision of an administrative tribunal?
Ontario, Canada
The following excerpt is from Rodrigues v. Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal, 2007 CanLII 37018 (ON SCDC):
Moreover, a failure to mention certain evidence is not necessarily fatal to the decision of an administrative tribunal (Trotter v. College of Nurses of Ontario, [1991] O.J. No. 348, 44 O.A.C. 302 (Div. Ct.)).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is it fatal to a decision that specific mention is not made of certain evidence? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for using the word "similar fact evidence" in a motion where the evidence is not the same fact evidence? (Ontario, Canada)
What is a reasonable decision for a tribunal to make a decision on a motion for sexual assault? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for overturning a decision of the administrative decision maker? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for reasonableness in the context of a judicial review of a decision made by an administrative tribunal? (Ontario, Canada)
Does a trial judge have to detail every aspect of her decision if she prefers some evidence over other evidence? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the "clean hands doctrine" in relation to dishonesty and untrustworthiness in certain areas of evidence? (Ontario, Canada)
Is there a duty of procedural fairness on every public authority making an administrative decision which is not of a legislative nature? (Ontario, Canada)
What impact would the inclusion of the evidence in the context of section 24(2) of the Charter under which the evidence is excluded? (Ontario, Canada)
How is a criminal acquittal considered in the context of a subsequent proceeding before an administrative tribunal? (Ontario, Canada)
