Is a covenant not to compete in a case "inherently reasonable"?
MultiRegion, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Campbell v. Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Junior University, 817 F.2d 499 (9th Cir. 1987):
The district court below cited Monogram Industries v. Sar Industries, 64 Cal.App.3d 692, 698, 134 Cal.Rptr. 714, 718-19 (1976), for the proposition that the California courts imply a reasonableness standard into sections 16600 to 16602 except in the employer-employee context. The court found also that the covenant not to compete in this case is "inherently reasonable."
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
If there is an error in the finding that a defendant is not guilty beyond a reasonable doubt on the basis of reasonable doubt, is that error harmless beyond reasonable doubt? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
First, if a child is removed from their home by a police officer, would they assert that the seizure was reasonable and reasonable? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a defendant need to have a competency hearing to determine whether he is competent to stand trial? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have the reasons for exclusion been explained in the reasons of the board? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
When there has not been a psychiatric evaluation, hearing or judicial determination of competence, when there has been no evidentiary review of the record, what is the test for determining whether defendant Lowenstein is competent to stand trial? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How has reasonable doubt been interpreted by courts in defining reasonable doubt? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the lodestar for calculating the amount of reasonable hours expended by a single person to meet a reasonable hourly rate? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the difference between whether a reasonable officer could have believed that the force used was reasonable under the circumstances? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for whether a person who has been found unfit to stand trial for murder by reason of reason is considered to be a "dangerous person" under s. 19(1)(a)(ii) of the Mental Health Act? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What are the reasons of a trial judge’s failure to state that they have a reasonable doubt? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
