Is a court entitled to an expert opinion in determining a reasonable fee for services provided?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Dolzhenko v. Valley Temps, Inc., B233449 (Cal. App. 2012):

Appellant argues that respondent's fee award had to be supported by expert opinion regarding the reasonable fee for the services provided. But "judges themselves are deemed to be experts on the value of legal services, and may rely on their own experience about reasonable and proper fees, without resort to expert testimony." (Donahue v. Donahue (2010) 182 Cal.App.4th 259, 276.) Appellant has not demonstrated a need for expert testimony in addition to the expertise of the trial court judge regarding a determination of the reasonable amount of fee to be awarded.

Other Questions


When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, does the appellate court have power to substitute its factual determination for that factual determination? (California, United States of America)
Whether a court's ruling is based on oral testimony or written declarations, when conflicting inferences can reasonably be drawn from the facts, can the appellate court defer to the trial court's factual determinations? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for failing to provide a reasonable probability that defendant would have obtained a more favourable result if counsel had failed to provide counsel with reasonable counsel? (California, United States of America)
What evidence does the Ontario Court of Appeal need to consider to determine whether a widow entitled to a pension is entitled to receive the pension from her dependent? (California, United States of America)
Can an appellate court review a determination of the entitlement to fees in a judgment even if there is no postjudgment order determining the amount of fees? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, can the appellate court substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, can the appellate court substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
What factors will the court consider in determining the admissibility of an expert opinion on voice identification? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a defendant is entitled to the independent review of the evidence provided by the courts? (California, United States of America)
Does a juvenile court hearing determine whether a minor should be tried as an adult prior to a determination that the minor's guilt should be determined? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.