Is a client entitled to a reasonable market rate for counsel's services?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Burgess v. Fair Political Practices Comm'n, E068433 (Cal. App. 2018):
a client, the court may still award the reasonable market rate for counsel's services. (Center for Biological Diversity v. County of San Bernardino (2010) 188 Cal.App.4th 603, 619.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for failing to provide a reasonable probability that defendant would have obtained a more favourable result if counsel had failed to provide counsel with reasonable counsel? (California, United States of America)
If counsel discovered that the burglary had been reduced to a misdemeanor, and lodged an objection below, would counsel have discovered that counsel had discovered that Counsel had discovered it was a misdemeanor? (California, United States of America)
Does a client who discharges his litigation counsel and retains new counsel to consummate litigation retain the work product of the attorney even if the attorney has been paid for his services? (California, United States of America)
What are the consequences of counsel failing to give counsel a reason for their failure to comply with a motion of motion? (California, United States of America)
What is a lawyer's obligation to take reasonable steps to avoid reasonably foreseeable prejudice upon withdrawing from representation of a client? (California, United States of America)
Does a defense counsel's failure to object to a prosecutor's reasonableness comments necessarily constitute ineffective assistance of counsel? (California, United States of America)
Is attorney-client privilege waived with respect to legal opinion and advice given to the client by counsel? (California, United States of America)
Does Counsel's statements imply that Counsel never stated whether a witness's statement was made in connection with the matter on which counsel represented her? (California, United States of America)
Is a prosecutor's comment that defense counsel was seeking to "distract the jury from the evidence as an attack on counsel's integrity a fair response to defense counsel's remarks? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for evidence that the appellant could reasonably reasonably reasonably expect the appellant to have knowledge of a crime? (California, United States of America)
