How have courts interpreted the definition of irreparable harm in the context of a stay of a deportation order?
Canada (Federal), Canada
The following excerpt is from Da Silva c. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2000 CanLII 14895 (FC):
This line of argument was touched upon by Robertson J.A. in Suresh v. M.C.I. 1999 CanLII 8393 (FCA), [1999] 4 F.C. 206, [1999] F.C.J. No. 1180 where a stay of a deportation order was in issue as well. On the issue of irreparable harm, Mr. Justice Robertson articulated his discomfort with the definition of irreparable harm by reference to damages:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have courts interpreted interpretative regulations in the context of the communications industry? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the interpretation of reasons in cases involving judicial review in the immigration context? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
How have courts interpreted federal legislation in the context of constitutional interpretation? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How has the Court interpreted the doctrine of federal jurisdiction in the context of the federal courts? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a defendant waive his right to receive translation services provided by a court interpreter under the Court Interpreters Act? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the affidavit required by the Ontario Superior Court to order publication of a summons? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a federal court order that a defendant be held in contempt of court for failing to comply with a federal contempt order? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted agency interpretation in the context of national security legislation? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the definition of "exclusive factors" in determining the meaning of a statutory definition of sexual activity? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the definition of "abuse of a minor" in the context of sexual abuse cases? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
