How have the courts interpreted the interpretation of reasons in cases involving judicial review in the immigration context?
Canada (Federal), Canada
The following excerpt is from C.P. Ships (Bermuda) Ltd. v. Panther Max (The), 2002 FCT 406 (CanLII):
See: Miranda v. Minister of Employment and Immigration (1993), 63 F.T.R. 80 (F.C.T.D.), a matter involving judicial review in the immigration context. Notwithstanding the difference of context, I am satisfied that the comments of Mr. Justice Joyal regarding the interpretation of reasons are applicable here.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have courts interpreted the meaning of the word "judicial review" in the context of judicial review? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the test for judicial review of judicial review rulings in cases involving abuse of discretion? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does the "new rule" limitation on habeas review by the federal courts validate reasonable, good-faith interpretations of existing precedents made by state courts? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the meaning of the word "judicial review" in the context of federal civil litigation? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the US Supreme Court consider whether the Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court has any authority or authority to issue an opinion in the context of judicial review? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the findings of a federal court in a case brought by a plaintiff in a medical malpractice case? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the case law in the context of abortion cases? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for judicial review of the use of judicial discretion in sentencing in cases involving impaired persons? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the meaning of the word "harvesting" in the context of a federal immigration case? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When reviewing administrators’ interpretations of legislation, does the reviewing court need to slip from reasonableness into correctness? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
