On a motion for interim support, is standing standing or entitlement?
Ontario, Canada
The following excerpt is from Chaudhry v. Meh, 2019 ONSC 7065 (CanLII):
On motions for interim support, the court will not conduct an in-depth analysis of standing or entitlement. Rather, the applicant need only make out a reasonable case for standing and entitlement before the court will proceed to assess the parties’ means and needs: Spence v. Sly, 2010 ONSC 6060, at para. 11.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
On an interim motion, is it more likely that the court will grant a motion to allow the motion to be heard before trial? (Ontario, Canada)
On a motion for interim spousal support, does the claimant have to prove entitlement on the balance of probabilities? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the difference between a motion for interim support and a final order under section 15.2 of the Spousal Support Act? (Ontario, Canada)
In what circumstances will the court order interim support on a motion for spousal support? (Ontario, Canada)
Is there a risk of a child dangling like a yo-yo at the end of their parents' string if a judge grants an interim order to change custody on an interim motion? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a motion for retroactive child and spousal support a matter of enforcement rather than retroactive support? (Ontario, Canada)
Can an interim order for support be made against a support agreement? (Ontario, Canada)
What are the principles applicable on an interim motion for spousal support? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a motion for interim spousal support be imputed to the payor? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for retroactive financial support on an interim motion? (Ontario, Canada)
