The following excerpt is from Bagwalla v. Ronin et al, and Ronin v. Ronin et al, 2017 ONSC 6693 (CanLII):
The Respondents argue that a party seeking an injunction to prohibit harassment need only satisfy the court that there are reasonable grounds to fear for his or her safety. They cite Shawyer v. Shawyer, [2016] O.J. No. 707 as authority for this proposition and for the general principles to be considered and applied when determining if those reasonable grounds exist. As an alternative, they allege harassment and intrusion upon seclusion as the underlying bases for the injunction.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.