In what circumstances have courts found no good cause for delay in determining whether there was good cause to delay in making a claim for damages?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Flores v. Unemployment Ins. Appeals Bd., 106 Cal.Rptr. 543, 30 Cal.App.3d 681 (Cal. App. 1973):
In Hicks v. Sheffield, Supra, 23 Cal.App.3d 441, 100 Cal.Rptr. 274, neither the length of the delay nor the excuse, if any, offered by the claimant is stated. Again the trial court found no good cause, and its decision was affirmed.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does the prosecution have any authority to determine whether the damage to the body caused by postmortem animal scavenging was caused by human caused mutilation? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a claim or claim arising from a motor vehicle accident is a claim for damages arising from an accident? (California, United States of America)
Does a juvenile court hearing determine whether a minor should be tried as an adult prior to a determination that the minor's guilt should be determined? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the court apply the totality circumstance test to determine whether the police acted reasonably in responding to a complaint? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a plaintiff is entitled to a claim for damages when the claim is invalid? (California, United States of America)
Does Defendant have a valid claim to be able to claim damages from a defendant who has been found guilty of a similar claim against the Defendant? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a motion where the Court of Appeal found that a lower court found that there was insufficient evidence to support the Plaintiff's claim? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether the court considered all relevant factors in determining a plaintiff's claim? (California, United States of America)
Whether a court's ruling is based on oral testimony or written declarations, when conflicting inferences can reasonably be drawn from the facts, can the appellate court defer to the trial court's factual determinations? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will appellate counsel make an independent review of the trial court proceedings and determine no meritorious claims for appeal? (California, United States of America)
