In what circumstances have counsel been found to be reasonable in their performance with regard to a pretrial motion?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Deason, F074755 (Cal. App. 2019):
of the reasonableness of counsel's performance with regard to the pretrial motion, however. (See People v. Scott (1993) 17 Cal.App.4th 405, 407.) And, in any event, we cannot say the trial court would have excludedor was required to excludethe interview, whether in response to a pretrial objection or an objection made at a time K.'s trial testimony rightfully could be considered.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for failing to provide a reasonable probability that defendant would have obtained a more favourable result if counsel had failed to provide counsel with reasonable counsel? (California, United States of America)
What are the consequences of counsel failing to give counsel a reason for their failure to comply with a motion of motion? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances have courts found that a husband has been found guilty of contempt and/or contempt by reason of failing to show cause? (California, United States of America)
If counsel discovered that the burglary had been reduced to a misdemeanor, and lodged an objection below, would counsel have discovered that counsel had discovered that Counsel had discovered it was a misdemeanor? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances have courts found that a defendant suffered no conceivable prejudice from the allegedly deficient performance of counsel? (California, United States of America)
Does counsel render ineffective assistance by failing to make motions or objections that counsel reasonably determines would be futile? (California, United States of America)
If a defendant makes a motion for a continuance of trial on grounds of ineffective assistance of counsel at trial, is it appropriate to appoint a new counsel to prepare the motion? (California, United States of America)
Can a defense counsel be found to have performed below an objective standard of reasonableness? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the court require a defense counsel to object to a motion where the trial atmosphere was poisonous, and the defense counsel did not object at all? (California, United States of America)
Can counsel be found to have failed to provide counsel with a proper performance review? (California, United States of America)
