In what circumstances can an appellant waive his right to attack error at trial?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Garcia v. Cal. Dep't of Corr., D063346 (Cal. App. 2015):
In Mesecher v. County of San Diego (1992) 9 Cal.App.4th 1677, 1685, we explained that " 'an appellant may waive his right to attack error by expressly or impliedly agreeing at trial to the ruling or procedure objected to on appeal.' " Further, principles of waiver "apply with particular force in the area of jury instructions." (Id. at p. 1686.) Here, in light
Page 25
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Can an appellant waive his right to attack error by agreeing at trial to the ruling or procedure objected to on appeal? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for an appellant who waives his right to attack error on appeal? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the Court reject appellant's assertion that expert testimony at trial violated his due process rights and rendered his trial fundamentally unfair? (California, United States of America)
How has the Court dealt with appellant's claim that multiple trial errors during his trial violated his due process rights? (California, United States of America)
Can an appellant waive his right to attack error by expressly or impliedly agreeing to the ruling or procedure objected to on appeal? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant who is read his Miranda rights knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waive their right to remain silent have knowingly waived their rights? (California, United States of America)
Does defendant's voluntary absence operate to waive his constitutional right to be present at trial and permitted continuation of the trial? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant have to waive his right to a jury trial to determine the truth or falsity of his special circumstance? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant makes a mid-trial motion to revoke his self represented status and have standby counsel appointed for the remainder of the trial, does the trial court have a duty to manage the trial? (California, United States of America)
Does defendant's voluntary absence operate to waive his constitutional right to be present at trial and permitted continuation of the trial? (California, United States of America)
