The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Johnson, 916 F.2d 716 (9th Cir. 1990):
Finally, we reject appellants' contention that the district court improperly denied their motion to reconsider the restitution order. As appellants had already filed their notices of appeal with this court, the district court had no jurisdiction to entertain their motion. Doyle v. United States, 721 F.2d 1195, 1197 (9th Cir.1983). Further, appellants lack the requisites necessary under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35 to file a motion for modification of the restitution order.
Appellants' convictions are affirmed.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.