In a civil case, in what circumstances will the admission of evidence be considered unconstitutional?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from The People v. Nunez, B215886, No. SA057247 (Cal. App. 2010):
To the extent that appellant contends the admission of the evidence violated his constitutional rights, we note that "'[t]he "routine application of state evidentiary law
Page 15
does not implicate [a] defendant's constitutional rights." [Citations.]'" (People v. Lewis, supra, 46 Cal.4th at p. 1284.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
In determining the sufficiency of evidence in a civil case, how have courts considered the evidence in the context of sexual assault cases? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will a jury consider evidence in a civil case? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the Supreme Court strike down a section of the Civil Rights Act that prohibits the use of certain types of civil rights, such as civil liberties, as well as those of the individual, in the context of civil liberties? (California, United States of America)
In a civil case, in what circumstances was a transcript admissible under California Evidence Code? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the court review the admission of evidence in a civil case? (California, United States of America)
In a contract impairment case arising out of section 340.9(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure Act, is there any case law where the court has found that the provision does not apply to all cases? (California, United States of America)
Is evidence of a person's character or trait of his or her character in a civil case admissible in the context of a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
Does a common law rule barring the admission of hearsay evidence in a civil case affect the reliability of evidence at trial? (California, United States of America)
What is relevant evidence in a civil case and what is the test for admissible evidence? (California, United States of America)
In a contract impairment case arising out of section 340.9(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure Act, is there any case law where the court has found that the provision does not apply to all cases? (California, United States of America)
