In a case involving a violation of section 148 of the California Code of Civil Procedure, how has the court treated the issue of knowledge as an element?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Lopez, 188 Cal.App.3d 592, 233 Cal.Rptr. 207 (Cal. App. 1986):

The trial court and counsel on both sides relied upon CALJIC No. 16.100. This instruction is in turn founded upon the misleading dictum of People v. Scrivens, supra, 276 Cal.App.2d at 433, 81 Cal.Rptr. 86. CALJIC No. 16.100 in future [188 Cal.App.3d 600] cases involving violations of section 148 should include knowledge as an element. 3

Other Questions


What are the elements of a violation of section 422 of the California Code of Civil Procedure, section 422(1) of the Criminal Code, and what is the test for that violation? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be convicted of violating section 148(a)(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure if the jury found a completed violation of section 148 prior to the officers' use of excessive force? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 139 of the California Civil Code, section 139 2 of the S.C. Code of Civil Procedure? (California, United States of America)
Does Section 1054(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure, section 1054 et. seq. and section 854 of the Criminal Code, allow defense counsel to conduct their investigation and prepare for trial? (California, United States of America)
Does Section 186.22 of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure (i.e. section 186. 22) Violate Due Process? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant required to independently demonstrate that the issue is a "public issue" within the meaning of section 425.16, subdivision (e) of the California Code of Civil Procedure? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 1016.5 of the California Immigration Code and how have the courts interpreted the word 'court' in that section? (California, United States of America)
In a contract impairment case arising out of section 340.9(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure Act, is there any case law where the court has found that the provision does not apply to all cases? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the Supreme Court strike down a section of the Civil Rights Act that prohibits the use of certain types of civil rights, such as civil liberties, as well as those of the individual, in the context of civil liberties? (California, United States of America)
Is a violation of section 148(a)(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure invalidated? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.