If evidence of all three criminal offences was admitted in error, does this constitute a miscarriage of justice?

But, even if evidence of all three uncharged crimes was admitted in error, it was manifestly harmless under any standard, in light of the evidence adduced at trial. "It is . . . well settled that the erroneous admission or exclusion of evidence does not require reversal except where the error or errors caused a miscarriage of justice. (Evid. Code, 353, subd. (b), 354.) '[A] "miscarriage of justice" should be declared only when the court, "after an examination of the entire cause, including the evidence," is of the "opinion" that it is reasonably probable that a result more favorable to the appealing party would have been reached in the absence of the error.' [Citations.]" (People v. Richardson (2008) 43 Cal.4th 959, 1001.)