Does a prosecutor improperly refer to prior criminal conduct not admitted as evidence in aggravation under section 190.3 of the California Criminal Code?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Cunningham, 108 Cal.Rptr.2d 291, 25 Cal.4th 926, 25 P.3d 519 (Cal. 2001):

The prosecutor's argument was proper. On rebuttal, a prosecutor may refer to prior criminal conduct not admitted as evidence in aggravation under section 190.3 if it relates directly to a particular incident or character trait that defendant offered on his own behalf. (People v. Noguera (1992) 4 Cal.4th 599, 644-645, 15 Cal.Rptr.2d 400, 842 P.2d 1160.) Moreover, it is not reasonably likely that the jury understood the prosecutor's comments as advocating that it consider the negotiated plea itself as a factor in aggravation. (People v. Sanders, supra, 11 Cal.4th 475, 526, 46 Cal. Rptr.2d 751, 905 P.2d 420.)

Defendant contends the prosecutor improperly argued that although defendant's mother cried while on the stand, defendant was unmoved by his mother's emotion, suggesting that by his demeanor he had shown himself to be a hardened criminal who deserved to die. It is proper for a prosecutor, at the penalty phase at which the defendant has placed his or her character in issue as a mitigating factor, to make references to the defendant's facial demeanor apparent during the court proceedings. (People v. Heishman (1988) 45 Cal.3d 147, 197, 246 Cal. Rptr. 673, 753 P.2d 629.)

Other Questions


Can a defendant be found to have committed a single physical act for purposes of section 654 of the California Criminal Code, Section 215 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 422 of the Criminal Code for carjacking? (California, United States of America)
Does section 667 of the California Criminal Code prohibit the District Attorney from invoking section 654 of the Criminal Code to strike a prior conviction enhancement under Section 667? (California, United States of America)
When will a court not abuse its discretion in admitting evidence under Evidence Code section 352 of the California Evidence Code? (California, United States of America)
Does Section 1054(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure, section 1054 et. seq. and section 854 of the Criminal Code, allow defense counsel to conduct their investigation and prepare for trial? (California, United States of America)
Does section 27 of the California Criminal Code, section 778a, subdivision (a)(1) of the Criminal Code of California apply to a defendant who is charged with a charge of conspiracy to commit a crime committed outside of the state? (California, United States of America)
Can evidence of a prior criminal act against a defendant be admitted under section 1101 of the California Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
Does section 654, subdivision (a) of the California Criminal Code, Section 654 of the Criminal Code protect a defendant against prosecution for an act or omission committed during a course of conduct deemed to be indivisible in time? (California, United States of America)
Does defendant have any grounds to argue that the Court of Appeal overturned a finding that a prosecutor improperly admitted evidence of sexual assault under section 352(b) of the California Evidence Code? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be punished under section 654(1) of the California Criminal Code for failing to comply with the requirements of Section 654 of the Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant have forfeited the issue of motive under section 1101, subdivision (b) of section 1103 of the Criminal Code for failing to provide evidence that the victim's prior criminal convictions would have bolstered his claim of self-defense? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.