What is the test for determining whether a recommended treatment would have improved the symptoms?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Wagner v. Newbery, 2015 BCSC 894 (CanLII):

In reply, counsel for the plaintiffs noted that the test is whether the recommended treatment would have ameliorated the symptoms: Gregory v. ICBC, 2011 BCCA 144, at para. 56.

Other Questions


What is the test for determining whether a plaintiff would have received the recommended treatment? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a plaintiff acted unreasonably in failing to obtain the recommended treatment? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a reasonable person would expect icy conditions would have been present? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the legal test for determining whether there has been anordinate delay in determining whether a claim has been successful? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a plaintiff acted unreasonably by not pursuing a recommended treatment? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a reasonable patient has followed a recommended treatment? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the relevant factors for determining whether either of two possible jurisdictions would be suitable for the determination of issues raised by the litigation at issue? (British Columbia, Canada)
What factors must be considered by a trier of fact in determining whether a patient would have refused treatment? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a reasonable patient has followed the recommended treatment? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a reasonable patient should have undergone the recommended treatment? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.