How would the result of a jury trial have been determined?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Ramirez, F068757 (Cal. App. 2015):
would have been different. (People v. Maury (2003) 30 Cal.4th 342, 389.) Because defendant has not shown error, he has further failed to demonstrate the second prong of ineffective assistance of trial counsel, prejudice.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have courts interpreted the rule that prior determination is not conclusive either if injustice would result or if the public interest requires that the prior determination not to be foreclosed? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant makes a mid-trial motion to revoke his self represented status and have standby counsel appointed for the remainder of the trial, does the trial court have a duty to manage the trial? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances would a defendant have been denied a continuance of his trial on the grounds that the trial would have been more favorable to him? (California, United States of America)
What is the state test for determining whether a jury would have reached a different result if the trial court had not made the challenged statements and rulings? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a trial judge to proceed with the trial of a defendant under section 1368 of the California Mental Health Act if the trial judge receives the reports of two psychiatrists? (California, United States of America)
What are the "magic words" required by the trial court to determine that a defendant is competent to stand trial? (California, United States of America)
What are the principles of a motion for a new trial where a witness in a murder trial later dies before the trial has even begun? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether an instructional error during a trial affected the outcome of the trial? (California, United States of America)
Does a deputy district attorney acquiesce in having the motion heard during the trial of a defendant before trial, rather than prior to trial? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a defendant suffered prejudice as a result of failing to grant a new trial? (California, United States of America)
