The following excerpt is from In re Alvarado, 496 B.R. 200 (E.D. Cal. 2013):
The court reviews the bankruptcy court's conclusions of law de novo, and its findings of fact for clear error. Citibank v. Eashai (In re Eashai), 87 F.3d 1082, 1086 (9th Cir.1996). A bankruptcy court's decision to grant or deny a motion to dismiss for misconduct that constitutes cause is reviewed for abuse of discretion; however, whether a particular type of misconduct
can constitute cause under 707(a) is a question of law that is reviewed de novo. In re Sherman, 491 F.3d 948, 969 (9th Cir.2007). A bankruptcy court's decision on attorney's fees is reviewed for abuse of discretion. Hale v. United States Trustee, 509 F.3d 1139, 1146 (9th Cir.2007).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.