The following excerpt is from Lauritzen, In re, 863 F.2d 886 (9th Cir. 1988):
Findings of fact by the bankruptcy judge are reviewed under the clearly erroneous standard while conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. Ragsdale v. Haller, 780 F.2d 794, 795 (9th Cir.1986). The district court's decision is reviewed de novo. In Re Woodson, 813 F.2d 266, 270 (9th Cir.1987).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.