California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Medina, E046082 (Cal. App. 2/27/2009), E046082 (Cal. App. 2009):
The People treat the issue as purely a discovery violation. (Pen. Code, 1054.1.) The People argue that (a) there was no violation under Brady v. Maryland (1963) 373 U.S. 83 [83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215] because the undisclosed information was not exculpatory, and (b) the prosecution dutifully turned over to respondent the names of the detectives who were called as witnesses, the written police report, and the physical evidence found at the crime scene. The People go on to argue that since respondent was living in the house and was present at the time of the search, he should have known about the clothing found. This was not a mere discovery violation.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.