How have the courts treated the issue of collateral matter in the context of the Sixth Amendment?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Perera, E069946 (Cal. App. 2019):
then considered a noncriminal collateral matter not falling within the ambit of the Sixth Amendment. (Chaidez v. United States (2013) 568 U.S. 342, 347-354.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have courts treated expert testimony in the context of police investigations and subsequent court proceedings? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated the issue of electronic surveillance in a juvenile court case? (California, United States of America)
How does the Court treat a claim by a defendant that an issue raised and decided in the trial court resulted in constitutional violations? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts treated the issue of consent in the context of a refund fraud case? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated the issue of ineffective assistance claims in the context of an ineffective assistance claim? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the Sixth Amendment in the context of pleading guilty? (California, United States of America)
In the absence of a decision by the California Supreme Court on the issue of consent for searches and seizures, what is the effect of the consent process in the context of this issue? (California, United States of America)
How have the Courts treated the issue of "forfeasibility" in the context of the appellant's appeal against his conviction for receiving stolen property? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated cases involving young defendants with severe intellectual deficiency in the context of mental health issues? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts treated the issue of forfeiture in the context of instructional error? (California, United States of America)
