How have courts treated cases involving young defendants with severe intellectual deficiency in the context of mental health issues?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Leon, 257 Cal.Rptr.3d 592, 456 P.3d 416, 8 Cal.5th 831 (Cal. 2020):

controlling precedent and are factually distinguishable. In Cooper v. Griffin (5th Cir. 1972) 455 F.2d 1142, 1144-1145, the defendants were only 15 and 16 years old and demonstrated considerable intellectual deficiency. They read at or below third grade level and had IQs ranging between 61 and 67, well into the "mentally retarded" range. ( Id . at p. 1145.) Moreover, uncontroverted testimony from four of their special education teachers established that neither was capable of understanding the Miranda

[8 Cal.5th 845]

Other Questions


How have courts treated mental health issues in the context of mental health care cases? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated mental health issues in a mental health case? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law where a defendant's mental health problems, including amnesia, have been treated as a mental health issue? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated mental health issues in assessing a defendant's mental state? (California, United States of America)
Does Section 1054.3(b) of the Mental Health Act restrict the prosecution's access to materials derived from mental health examinations conducted under section 1054 of the Act, which were obtained from a mental health clinic? (California, United States of America)
How does a defendant defend in a personal injury case using a cross-examining technique used in a mental health case? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated mental health issues in medical malpractice cases? (California, United States of America)
How has the court treated a motion to dismiss a case against defendant in a mental health matter? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated the issue of mistake of fact in a mental health case? (California, United States of America)
Does Defendant have a claim that the trial court abused its discretion to treat Defendant as a "defendant" in a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.