How have the courts treated expert testimony in medical malpractice cases?

"New York", United States of America

The following excerpt is from People v. Diaz, 2013 NY Slip Op 01994 (N.Y. 2013):

I concur in the result, and write separately because I believe the majority incorrectly concludes that the expert testimony was properly admitted under our prior decision in

Page 6

People v. Spicola (16 NY3d 441 [2011]) and today's decision in People v. Williams (__NY3d__).

Other Questions


How have courts treated conflicting expert testimony in medical malpractice cases? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is it a "rare" medical malpractice case in which no expert medical testimony is required? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the findings of a federal court in a case brought by a plaintiff in a medical malpractice case? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How has the Court treated the work of an expert who has provided evidence in a medical malpractice case? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have courts treated medical indifference claims in medical malpractice cases? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for exclusion of expert testimony in medical malpractice cases? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is there any case law supporting the credibility of witness testimony in a medical malpractice case? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can an application for discretionary relief from the Court of Arbitration for Disproportionate Medical Demand be made in a medical malpractice case? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the test for allowing expert testimony in a medical malpractice case? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have courts treated credibility in medical malpractice cases? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.