How has the Court treated the work of an expert who has provided evidence in a medical malpractice case?

MultiRegion, United States of America

The following excerpt is from In re Incretin Mimetics Prods. Liab. Litig., MDL Case No.13md2452 AJB (MDD) (S.D. Cal. 2015):

11. Affirmed in part, and vacated as to additional considerations placed on the expert's work as an expert witness by Rupp v. U.S., (2008) WL 6638217 (S.D. Cal. Nov. 26, 2008).

Other Questions


How have the courts interpreted the findings of a federal court in a case brought by a plaintiff in a medical malpractice case? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have courts treated conflicting expert testimony in medical malpractice cases? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have courts treated medical indifference claims in medical malpractice cases? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have the courts treated expert testimony in medical malpractice cases? ("New York", United States of America)
How have the courts treated the evidence in defence of the case of the Attorney General's defence in the context of the Court of Appeal? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have courts treated potential errors in a medical malpractice case? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can an application for discretionary relief from the Court of Arbitration for Disproportionate Medical Demand be made in a medical malpractice case? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Is it a "rare" medical malpractice case in which no expert medical testimony is required? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How has the court treated the argument that the court improperly attributed more weight to circumstantial evidence than to direct evidence? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have courts treated credibility in medical malpractice cases? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.