How have the courts interpreted the relevant testimony at trial?
MultiRegion, United States of America
The following excerpt is from United States v. Matanky, 482 F.2d 1319 (9th Cir. 1973):
We briefly summarize the relevant testimony elicited at trial, mindful that the evidence must be considered in the light most favorable to the Government. Glasser v. United States, 315 U.S. 60, 80, 62 S.Ct. 457, 86 L.Ed. 680 (1943);
[482 F.2d 1323]
United States v. Baxter (9 Cir., February 16, 1973, No. 71-2082) (slip opinion at 3).[482 F.2d 1323]
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is a motion for a continuance granted by the trial court on the date of trial on the basis that the trial judge abused his discretion to grant the motion? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for a motion to compel the Court to dismiss a motion alleging that a judge has improperly interpreted the interpretation of a statutory interpretation of an administrative determination? ("New York", United States of America)
Does a state court have the authority to interpret the findings of a federal court when determining whether a federal judge has found that a state judge has jurisdiction to interpret a federal finding? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
In a motion for a new trial, in what circumstances will the US Supreme Court grant a motion to reverse the judgment of the district court and remand for new trial? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a factual finding from a state court relevant to the federal court review if the relevant record is unavailable for review? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a federal court grant habeas corpus relief for alleged errors in the interpretation or application of state sentencing laws by either a state trial or appellate court? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a defendant waive his right to receive translation services provided by a court interpreter under the Court Interpreters Act? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How will a court review a trial court's decision to exclude testimony from a witness? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for interpretation of Section 33 of the O.S.O.A.C.L.B.O., or, if any, how have courts interpreted the relevant provisions in the Equal Access Act? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does the trial court erred by closing the trial to the public during the testimony of undercover officers? ("New York", United States of America)
