Does the trial court erred by closing the trial to the public during the testimony of undercover officers?

"New York", United States of America

The following excerpt is from People v. Rosario, 616 N.Y.S.2d 334, 639 N.E.2d 1131, 83 N.Y.2d 994 (N.Y. 1994):

In these cases involving charges of criminal narcotics sale arising out of a street "buy and bust," the trial court erred by closing the trial to the public during the undercover officers' testimony. The trial court's ruling in 1991 was based on a legal standard that is no longer viable under our analysis and holding in People v. Martinez, 82 N.Y.2d 436, 604 N.Y.S.2d 932, 624 N.E.2d 1027, decided in 1993.

Other Questions


In a motion for a new trial, in what circumstances will the US Supreme Court grant a motion to reverse the judgment of the district court and remand for new trial? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
If we were present at the trial, would we have found that the trial court erred on the issue of proximate cause? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When a hearing officer disagrees with a decision made by the reviewing officer on the issues with which he disagreed with the hearing officer, how will the review officer's decision be considered? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How will a court review a trial court's decision to exclude testimony from a witness? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a motion for a continuance granted by the trial court on the date of trial on the basis that the trial judge abused his discretion to grant the motion? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have courts dealt with cases where a defendant interrupted the closing argument of a trial and then continued to argue with the judge after the trial was adjourned? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a lawsuit against a public officer in his official capacity a way of pleading against the public entity of which the officer is an agent? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does the trial judge erred in denying a post-trial motion for a new trial based upon alleged violations of sequestration order by members of the jury or marshals assigned to supervise the jury? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How has the Court considered the appellant's claim that the district court erred by refusing to grant him a new trial? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for out-of-court testimonial statements in the context of expert testimony? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.