How have the courts interpreted the Miranda warning during a police interview?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Holquin, E071989 (Cal. App. 2020):

4. After testimony about the initial interview at the scene, the trial court ruled that the initial interview was not admissible because no constitutional warnings were given pursuant to Miranda v. Arizona (1966) 384 U.S. 436 (Miranda). The court directed counsel to present testimony about only the station house interview where Miranda warnings were given.

5. An audio recording of the interview was played for the jury at trial.

Other Questions


How have the courts interpreted a transcript of a police interview with a defendant following his arrest and waiver of Miranda rights? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the Miranda Miranda Miranda Statement? (California, United States of America)
Is a police interview inadmissible because the interview contains a defective Miranda warning? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the Miranda Miranda warning that anything he said could and would be used against him? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted Miranda warnings in the context of the Miranda waiver? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the Miranda Miranda Miranda rights in this context? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 1016.5 of the California Immigration Code and how have the courts interpreted the word 'court' in that section? (California, United States of America)
Is a police officer required to warn a suspect in police custody of their Miranda rights? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law where a police interview was conducted without a Miranda warning? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the Miranda rights of a defendant's Miranda waiver? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.