How have the courts interpreted the Miranda rights of an undercover officer?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Martinez, B255184 (Cal. App. 2015):

Based on this, defendant argued that the operation was a custodial interrogation requiring Miranda rights to be given. He distinguished Illinois v. Perkins (1990) 496 U.S. 292, 296 (Perkins), which found that "[c]onversations between suspects and undercover agents do not implicate the concerns underlying Miranda." Defendant argued that the undercover operation here "goes far beyond what the undercover officer did" in

Page 16

Other Questions


How has the court interpreted the Miranda rights of a minor who, as a minor, waived his Miranda right to be arrested? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the Miranda Miranda Miranda rights in this context? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the Miranda rights of a suspect who waives their right to counsel? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the Miranda rights of an undercover agent? (California, United States of America)
In reviewing a claim that the Miranda rights were violated, how have courts reviewed the evidence in the context of Miranda rights claims? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the Miranda rights of a defendant's Miranda waiver? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 1016.5 of the California Immigration Code and how have the courts interpreted the word 'court' in that section? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the Miranda Miranda Miranda Statement? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the Miranda rights of a defendant in a case where a confession was obtained in violation of the Miranda Rule? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the Miranda rights in the context of criminal cases? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.