How have the courts interpreted the Miranda rights of a defendant?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Hinds, 154 Cal.App.3d 222, 201 Cal.Rptr. 104 (Cal. App. 1984):
The trial court's ruling rejecting appellant's Miranda objections was clearly erroneous. Because the facts relating to this issue are uncontradicted, we need not defer to the trial court's finding. (People v. Jimenez (1978) 21 Cal.3d 595, 609, 147 Cal.Rptr. 172, 580 P.2d 672.) As respondent concedes, the record shows several blatant Miranda violations; appellant suggests additional possibilities.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How has the court interpreted the Miranda rights of a minor who, as a minor, waived his Miranda right to be arrested? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the Miranda rights of a defendant's Miranda waiver? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the Miranda rights of a defendant who assaulted another defendant with a chain? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the Miranda rights of a defendant in a case where a confession was obtained in violation of the Miranda Rule? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the Miranda Miranda Miranda rights in this context? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the Miranda Miranda Miranda Statement? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the Miranda rights of a defendant in an assault case? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 1016.5 of the California Immigration Code and how have the courts interpreted the word 'court' in that section? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the Miranda rights of a defendant in a murder case? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the Miranda rights of a suicidal, acutely psychotic defendant in a murder case? (California, United States of America)
